New Delhi, [Current Date] – In a significant move aimed at bolstering its export sector and safeguarding domestic industries, the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT), under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, has announced extensions for several key trade promotion schemes and Minimum Import Price (MIP) conditions. While schemes like the Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products (RoDTEP) and the Rebate of State and Central Taxes and Levies (RoSCTL) receive a three-month extension, the Resilience & Logistics Intervention for Export Facilitation (RELIEF) programme sees its eligibility timeline stretched significantly further. Simultaneously, MIPs on select imported goods, including paper, specific pharmaceutical ingredients, and specialized chemicals, have also been prolonged, signaling a continued focus on both export competitiveness and strategic import management.
These decisions come at a crucial juncture for India’s trade landscape, marked by persistent global economic uncertainties, geopolitical tensions impacting supply chains, and an ambitious national target to achieve substantial growth in exports. The government’s multi-pronged approach reflects an attempt to provide immediate relief and predictability to exporters while also offering long-term support where deemed critical, albeit with some aspects drawing critique from industry experts.

The Lifeline for Exporters: RoDTEP and RoSCTL Extensions
The RoDTEP and RoSCTL schemes, pivotal for enhancing the competitiveness of Indian exports, have been extended until December 31 of the current year. This three-month extension is designed to ensure "policy continuity and predictability for exporters," according to an official government press release. The primary beneficiaries are expected to be India’s labour-intensive and value-added sectors, particularly the apparel and made-ups industries, which operate in an increasingly competitive global trading environment.
Understanding RoDTEP and RoSCTL
The Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products (RoDTEP) scheme was introduced to replace the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) in January 2021, following a World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling against India’s export subsidy programmes. Its core objective is to refund to exporters the embedded duties, taxes, and levies that are not rebated under any other mechanism. These include central and state taxes such as VAT on fuel used for transportation, electricity duty, mandi tax, stamp duty, and other local levies. By refunding these non-creditable taxes, RoDTEP aims to make Indian products more competitive in international markets by neutralizing the domestic tax burden. The benefit under RoDTEP is determined by the applicable Harmonized System (HS) code of the product, a prescribed rate, and a value cap.
)
Similarly, the Rebate of State and Central Taxes and Levies (RoSCTL) scheme, specifically tailored for the apparel and made-ups sectors, provides a rebate for all embedded State and Central Taxes/Levies that are not otherwise covered by other schemes. This scheme predates RoDTEP for these specific sectors and was merged with it for a period before being reinstated as a standalone mechanism due to its critical importance for these labour-intensive industries. RoSCTL ensures that the domestic taxes on inputs used in the manufacture of exported garments and made-ups are rebated, thus reducing the cost of production and enhancing export viability. Both schemes are crucial for maintaining the financial health and export momentum of industries that employ millions and contribute significantly to India’s manufacturing output.
Government’s Rationale for the Extension
The government’s decision to extend these schemes, even if for a short duration, underscores its commitment to supporting India’s export-oriented manufacturing base. The apparel and made-ups sectors, in particular, are vital for their high employment generation potential and their ability to absorb a large workforce, including a significant number of women. In a volatile global economic climate where demand fluctuations and intense international competition are common, predictable policy support is paramount. The extension, therefore, aims to provide a temporary cushion, allowing exporters to fulfill existing orders and secure new ones without immediate uncertainty regarding cost structures.

Industry’s Plea for Long-Term Certainty
While the extension of RoDTEP and RoSCTL is welcomed as a temporary measure, it has simultaneously reignited calls from the export community for a more stable and long-term policy framework. Ajay Srivastava, founder of the Global Trade and Research Initiative (GTRI), voiced a common sentiment within the industry, stating that such a short extension "defeats the scheme’s core purpose." He advocates for the government to announce a five-year extension to provide exporters with the much-needed certainty, enabling them to price orders competitively and avoid losing contracts due to policy ambiguity.
The Export Cycle and Pricing Challenges
Srivastava’s concerns highlight a fundamental aspect of international trade: the long lead times involved in export transactions. Exporters typically finalize orders months, sometimes even a year, before the actual shipment date. During this period, they must commit to prices, factoring in all costs, including the expected rebates from government schemes. Without a clear, long-term assurance that schemes like RoDTEP and RoSCTL will continue, exporters are forced to operate under a cloud of uncertainty. They cannot confidently factor in tax refunds into their pricing, which puts them at a significant disadvantage against competitors from countries with more stable incentive regimes.
)
In today’s difficult export environment, characterized by rising logistics costs, currency fluctuations, and cautious global demand, every cost advantage is critical for retaining business. Short-term policy extensions make it challenging for Indian exporters to offer competitive prices and commit to large, multi-year contracts, potentially leading to a loss of market share. This uncertainty also deters long-term investments in capacity expansion, technology upgrades, and skill development, which are essential for sustained export growth and global competitiveness. Industry bodies have consistently emphasized that a stable policy environment is a prerequisite for fostering a robust and resilient export ecosystem.
Navigating Geopolitical Headwinds: The RELIEF Scheme Extension
Beyond the regular export incentive schemes, the government has also extended the eligibility timeline under the Resilience & Logistics Intervention for Export Facilitation (RELIEF) programme, an intervention under the Export Promotion Mission (EPM), until March 31, 2027. This extension specifically covers eligibility and validity criteria under Component II for shipments meant for delivery or transhipment. The primary goal is to enhance utilization of the scheme and facilitate trade resilience, particularly in light of ongoing logistics and trade disruptions stemming from conflicts in West Asia.
)
Purpose and Context of RELIEF
The RELIEF scheme was initially introduced as a time-limited support mechanism to address elevated export risks arising from geopolitical disturbances. The most prominent of these disruptions in recent times has been the Red Sea crisis, where attacks on commercial vessels by Houthi rebels have forced shipping companies to reroute vessels around the Cape of Good Hope, significantly increasing transit times and freight costs for trade between Asia and Europe/North America. These rerouting efforts have led to longer voyages, higher fuel consumption, increased insurance premiums, and a shortage of container availability, all of which directly impact the competitiveness and profitability of Indian exports.
The extension of RELIEF for Component II means that eligible shipments will continue to receive crucial support for nearly three more years, providing a much-needed buffer against these persistent external shocks. This intervention is critical for maintaining India’s supply chain integrity and ensuring that Indian exporters can continue to access key markets despite the challenging global logistics environment. By mitigating some of the financial burdens associated with these disruptions, RELIEF helps Indian businesses absorb shocks and maintain their international trade commitments, thereby safeguarding jobs and economic activity.
)
Significance for Trade Resilience
The RELIEF extension underscores the government’s recognition of the profound impact of geopolitical events on global trade. In an increasingly interconnected world, conflicts in one region can have ripple effects across continents, disrupting established trade routes and supply networks. For a major trading nation like India, which relies heavily on maritime trade, such disruptions pose significant economic challenges. By extending RELIEF, the government is actively working to enhance the resilience of its export sector, enabling it to better withstand and adapt to unforeseen global challenges. This proactive measure aligns with India’s broader strategy of strengthening its position in global value chains and diversifying its trade relationships.
Protecting Domestic Industries: Minimum Import Prices (MIPs)
In parallel with its export promotion efforts, the DGFT has also extended Minimum Import Price (MIP) conditions on several specified products, reinforcing the government’s commitment to protecting domestic industries from unfair competition and ensuring market stability. MIPs are a trade policy tool used to set a floor price for imported goods, below which they cannot be imported. This measure is typically implemented to prevent dumping (selling goods at artificially low prices) or to support nascent or struggling domestic industries against cheaper foreign alternatives.
)
Paper and Paperboard Sector
The MIP of Rs 67,220 per metric tonne (MT) on specified paper and paperboard products under Chapter 48 has been extended for six months, until March 31, 2027. This MIP is based on the Cost, Insurance, and Freight (CIF) value. The Indian paper industry has long advocated for protective measures against cheap imports, particularly from ASEAN countries, which often benefit from preferential tariff agreements. The domestic industry faces challenges such as rising raw material costs, environmental compliance expenses, and capital-intensive operations. The extension of the MIP is expected to provide continued relief to Indian paper manufacturers, allowing them to compete on a more level playing field, encourage domestic production, and support the sustainability of the sector, which relies heavily on agricultural residue and recycled paper for raw materials.
Pharmaceutical Sector (Sulfadiazine Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient – API)
The MIP condition on imports of Sulfadiazine Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) under Chapter 29 has been extended until November 30, 2026. APIs are the biologically active components of a drug product, and their secure and affordable supply is critical for the pharmaceutical industry. India has historically been reliant on imports for a significant portion of its API requirements. The extension of MIP on Sulfadiazine API likely aims to support domestic API manufacturing capabilities, reduce import dependence, and ensure the availability of essential medicines. This move aligns with the ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ (Self-Reliant India) initiative, which emphasizes strengthening domestic manufacturing across strategic sectors, including pharmaceuticals, to enhance national security and economic resilience.
)
Specialized Products (ATS-8)
Furthermore, the MIP condition on specified ATS-8 imports has been extended until November 30, 2026, with the applicable MIP set at $111 per kg of the CIF value. While the specific nature and strategic importance of ATS-8 are not detailed in the original announcement, such MIPs are typically imposed on specialized chemicals or products to protect a niche domestic industry, ensure quality standards, or manage the supply of strategically important inputs. These measures often reflect a careful balancing act by the government between promoting free trade and safeguarding specific domestic industrial interests.
Overall Impact of MIPs
The extension of these MIPs reflects a strategic approach by the government to manage imports in a way that supports domestic production and fair competition. While MIPs can sometimes lead to higher input costs for downstream industries that rely on these imported products, their primary intent is to prevent market distortions caused by predatory pricing or excessive dumping. These measures are often implemented after careful consultation with relevant industry stakeholders and are subject to periodic review based on market conditions and the health of the domestic sector.
)
Official Responses and Broader Economic Strategy
The DGFT, as the principal agency for formulating and implementing foreign trade policy, plays a crucial role in these decisions. Its actions are guided by the broader economic vision and objectives set forth by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. These extensions are part of India’s comprehensive strategy to boost its merchandise and services exports, aiming for ambitious targets like $1 trillion in goods and services exports in the coming years.
The government’s balancing act involves providing timely support to exporters to enhance their global competitiveness, while simultaneously protecting domestic industries from adverse international trade practices. The short-term extensions for RoDTEP and RoSCTL, despite industry calls for longer predictability, might indicate a cautious approach, perhaps allowing for flexibility to adjust rates or parameters based on evolving global trade dynamics, budgetary considerations, and WTO compliance reviews. On the other hand, the longer extension for RELIEF underscores the perceived enduring nature of geopolitical risks to logistics.
)
Implications and Future Outlook
The recent announcements from the DGFT present a mixed bag for India’s trade sector. On one hand, the extensions offer immediate relief and continuity for exporters, particularly those in labour-intensive sectors, and provide essential support against global supply chain disruptions. The continued application of MIPs offers a protective shield for specific domestic industries grappling with international competition.
However, the short-term nature of the RoDTEP and RoSCTL extensions continues to be a point of contention for exporters who seek greater certainty to plan investments and pricing strategies over longer horizons. This tension between short-term tactical support and long-term strategic policy is a recurring theme in India’s trade policy discourse.
)
Looking ahead, the effectiveness of these measures will depend on several factors: the stability of the global economic environment, the persistence of geopolitical tensions, and the ongoing dialogue between the government and industry stakeholders. Exporters will be keenly watching for further clarity and longer-term commitments on incentive schemes, while domestic industries will continue to rely on protective measures to foster growth. As India strives to deepen its integration into global value chains and achieve its ambitious export targets, a predictable, stable, and responsive trade policy framework will remain paramount. The current extensions are a testament to the government’s active engagement in navigating these complex challenges, even as the call for more enduring policy solutions echoes through the export corridors.
