Mumbai, India – In the ever-evolving landscape of Bollywood, where scrutiny is as constant as the paparazzi flashbulbs, actor Akshay Kumar has found himself the subject of widespread online criticism for his alleged reliance on teleprompters. However, veteran director Priyadarshan and esteemed actor Boman Irani have stepped forward to defend Kumar, asserting that the use of prompting is a common and accepted practice within the film industry, even among its biggest stars. The debate, ignited by clips circulating online, highlights a growing disconnect between behind-the-scenes realities and public perception.
The Genesis of the Controversy: A Digital Backlash
The recent wave of criticism against Akshay Kumar began to gain traction following promotional activities for his upcoming film OMG 2. Videos from various events, including those related to Kanappa, Sarfira, Naagin 7, and even older films like Toilet: Ek Prem Katha, surfaced on social media platforms. These clips appeared to show Kumar utilizing a teleprompter to deliver his lines, leading to a barrage of online mockery and accusations of being "over-dependent" on technology.
)
Netizens, armed with the power of instant commentary and viral sharing, were quick to label the actor as lacking in his craft, with many expressing disappointment and questioning his performance capabilities. The narrative quickly shifted from celebrating his prolific career to dissecting his perceived reliance on external aids, sparking a heated debate about authenticity and the pressures faced by actors in the digital age. The sheer volume of these criticisms, amplified across platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Instagram, painted a picture of widespread disapproval, prompting a response from those who have worked closely with Kumar.
Priyadarshan and Boman Irani: Voices of Experience and Support
In an exclusive interaction with DNA, both Priyadarshan, a director with whom Kumar has a long-standing professional relationship, and Boman Irani, a frequent co-star, have offered their perspectives, aiming to contextualize the practice and defend their colleague. Their statements not only aim to shield Kumar from what they deem unfair criticism but also shed light on the pragmatic realities of filmmaking.
)
Priyadarshan: "Ignore the Trolls, Focus on Acceptance"
Director Priyadarshan, known for his successful collaborations with Akshay Kumar on films like Hera Pheri, Bhagam Bhag, Bhool Bhulaiyaa, and the upcoming Haiwaan, dismissed the online vitriol as a typical product of the current social media landscape. He emphasized that criticism, however harsh, is now a constant companion for public figures.
)
"When it comes to criticism, netizens can criticize anything today," Priyadarshan stated. "In those days, people used to sit in a coffee shop; today, it’s on social media. So we should just ignore it." He went on to articulate a philosophy centered on the audience’s acceptance as the ultimate measure of an actor’s relevance. "You do whatever you feel is right, as long as you’re accepted. You’re successful. No matter how genuine or perfect you are, the moment the acceptance goes, it means he’s no longer relevant."
)
Priyadarshan concluded his defense by reaffirming his belief in Akshay Kumar’s enduring appeal: "Now he’s (Akshay) been accepted. Let him do whatever he wants to. People love him. This is what I believe." This sentiment underscores the idea that an actor’s performance, regardless of the methods employed, is ultimately judged by the audience’s reception and continued patronage.
)
Boman Irani: "Don’t Judge What Happens Off-Screen"
Boman Irani, who has shared the screen with Kumar in films like Waqt: Race Against Time and the Housefull franchise, offered a more direct perspective, urging the public to focus on the on-screen product rather than dissecting the behind-the-scenes processes.
)
"For me, it’s simple. Parde ka ek rectangle hota hai. Us mein jo chal raha hai usse criticise karo. Uske bahar jo hua, usse kya lena-dena hai tumhe. How did he manage to pull that off? Whether he used a teleprompter or stickers," Irani articulated, drawing a clear distinction between the magic of cinema and the mechanics of its creation. He believes that the audience’s focus should remain on the narrative and the performance as presented on screen.
)
Irani further suggested that the current scrutiny is a result of increased transparency and behind-the-scenes content available to the public. "The reason Akki is getting criticised is that people have been exposed too much to BTS," he explained. "If nobody had told you, you would never have an idea ki yeh teleprompter use karta hai. You’ll say, ‘Wonderful performance’. But now you want to criticise. Woh kaise bhi kare." This implies that the awareness of such techniques, while demystifying, can also lead to undue judgment.
)
Chronology of the Teleprompter Debate
The current controversy surrounding Akshay Kumar’s use of teleprompters is not an isolated incident, but rather a culmination of trends and observations that have gained momentum in recent years.
)
- Early Observations (Pre-2020s): While not as widely publicized, the use of teleprompters or cue cards by actors during promotional events or even live performances has been a quiet practice for a considerable time across various entertainment industries globally. This was often seen as a discreet aid to ensure flawless delivery.
- Rise of Social Media and Viral Content (Early 2020s onwards): The proliferation of smartphones and the ease with which short video clips can be captured and shared have amplified scrutiny. Moments that might have previously gone unnoticed or been confined to backstage discussions are now instantly broadcast to millions.
- Specific Clips Emerge (Mid-2023 to Present): Recent months have seen a surge in specific video clips featuring Akshay Kumar where the presence and use of a teleprompter are evident. These clips, often taken out of context or presented without explanation, became the catalysts for the current wave of trolling.
- Promotional Tours and Events: The increased frequency of promotional tours for multiple films, coupled with Kumar’s consistent public appearances, has provided more opportunities for such clips to be recorded and disseminated.
- Backlash Intensifies (Late 2023 – Early 2024): The online mockery escalated significantly, with memes, critical commentary, and widespread discussion dominating social media conversations related to the actor.
- Defense from Industry Insiders (Early 2024): In response to the mounting criticism, prominent figures like Priyadarshan and Boman Irani have publicly defended Akshay Kumar, bringing a seasoned perspective to the debate.
Supporting Data: The Ubiquity of Prompting in Performance
The defense offered by Priyadarshan and Boman Irani is not without its basis in industry practice. The use of prompting devices, whether teleprompters, ear pieces with scripts, or even subtle cue cards, is a widespread phenomenon across various performance-based professions.
)
- Theatrical Productions: In live theatre, actors often rely on prompters, especially for complex roles or long runs. While some purists may advocate for complete memorization, the practicalities of performance often necessitate assistance.
- Television Appearances: For talk show interviews, award ceremonies, and live broadcasts, teleprompters are standard equipment to ensure that hosts and guests deliver their messages clearly and concisely, especially when dealing with prepared statements or complex information.
- Corporate Presentations and Public Speaking: Even in the corporate world, public speakers and presenters frequently utilize teleprompters to maintain their train of thought and deliver polished speeches.
- Music Concerts: While musicians are often lauded for their memory, many artists utilize teleprompters for lyrics, especially during extensive tours or when performing new material.
- Film and Television (Beyond Dialogue Delivery): Beyond dialogue, teleprompters can be used for delivering award acceptance speeches, making announcements, or even for continuity in dialogue-heavy scenes where precision is paramount.
Priyadarshan’s specific mention of the South Indian film industry further corroborates this. Many regional film industries have their own established practices, and the use of prompting is not an anomaly but rather a pragmatic approach to managing the demanding schedules and diverse roles actors undertake. He stated, "In the South, most of the actors use prompting. In plays, everybody uses prompting. The only extra word here is ‘telly’." This highlights that what is being criticized as a deficiency in Bollywood might be a standard operating procedure elsewhere.
)
Official Responses and Industry Perspectives
The primary official response has come from Priyadarshan and Boman Irani themselves, acting as vocal proponents for Akshay Kumar and offering a broader perspective on industry norms. Their statements can be interpreted as an attempt to:
)
- Humanize the Actor: To remind the public that actors, like all professionals, have tools and techniques that aid their performance.
- Demystify the Process: To explain that what might appear as a crutch is often a practical solution to the pressures of performance.
- Champion Professionalism: To argue that utilizing available technology to ensure a good performance is a sign of professionalism, not a lack of talent.
- Address Unfair Scrutiny: To counter what they perceive as an unfair and often ill-informed barrage of criticism directed at a seasoned performer.
The silence from Akshay Kumar himself on this specific issue, until now, could be attributed to a strategic decision to let his work and the voices of his colleagues speak for him. However, the continuous nature of the trolling might necessitate a more direct engagement in the future.
)
Implications for the Entertainment Industry and Public Perception
The ongoing debate surrounding Akshay Kumar’s use of teleprompters has several significant implications for the entertainment industry and public perception:
)
- The Double-Edged Sword of Transparency: While social media has brought audiences closer to their favourite stars, it has also opened them up to a level of scrutiny that can be detrimental. The increased availability of behind-the-scenes content, while engaging, can also foster an environment where every minor detail is dissected and judged.
- Redefining "Authenticity": The controversy raises questions about what constitutes an "authentic" performance. Is it solely about memorization and improvisation, or does it encompass the skillful utilization of all available resources to deliver a compelling on-screen presence? The industry’s acceptance of prompting suggests a broader definition of authenticity, one that prioritizes the final product.
- The Pressure on Actors: The relentless criticism highlights the immense pressure actors face to be perceived as flawless. Even successful and established actors are not immune to public judgment, which can be particularly harsh when it pertains to their perceived skills.
- The Role of Media and Social Media: The speed and reach of social media mean that a single clip can snowball into a national conversation, often without full context or nuance. This places a significant responsibility on both the platforms and the users to engage in more informed and less judgmental discourse.
- Future of Performance Aids: As technology continues to advance, the use of performance aids is likely to become even more sophisticated and integrated. This debate may foreshadow future discussions about the role of AI, virtual assistants, and other advanced technologies in the creative process.
As Priyadarshan’s upcoming film Haiwaan is set for release on September 11, 2026, this conversation also serves as a backdrop to the promotional efforts. It underscores the complex relationship between celebrity, public opinion, and the often-unseen mechanisms that bring cinematic magic to life. Ultimately, while the online world may offer a platform for immediate judgment, the enduring appeal of stars like Akshay Kumar rests on their ability to connect with audiences, a feat achieved through a multitude of methods, both seen and unseen. The defense from veteran industry stalwarts suggests that the focus should remain on the magic delivered on screen, rather than the tools used to create it.
