BENGALURU, June 15, 2026 – Amidst an intensifying global discourse on artificial intelligence and a rising tide of protectionist sentiments, a prominent voice from India’s technology landscape has offered a robust defense of the nation’s IT industry. Kris Gopalakrishnan, co-founder of the global IT powerhouse Infosys, has publicly endorsed the argument that Indian IT firms should not be judged by their absence in the "frontier AI development" race, particularly in building large language models (LLMs) akin to OpenAI’s ChatGPT. Instead, Gopalakrishnan affirmed, their core strength and strategic contribution lie in the indispensable realms of services, job creation, export revenue generation, and, critically, the pragmatic implementation of AI solutions across industries.

The endorsement by a figure of Gopalakrishnan’s stature lends significant weight to a perspective that challenges the prevailing narrative often critical of India’s perceived lag in foundational AI research. It underscores a strategic divergence, suggesting that the value proposition of Indian IT companies like Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Infosys, Wipro, and HCL Technologies is inherently different from that of Silicon Valley’s venture-backed AI startups. This viewpoint, initially articulated by an X (formerly Twitter) user named Piramal, highlights the unique business models, economic contributions, and societal impact that define India’s technology giants.

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said

The debate has gained particular urgency following reports of AI startup Anthropic, a key player in the generative AI space, reportedly restricting access to some of its advanced AI models for foreign nationals. This move, ostensibly in response to a US export-control directive aimed at safeguarding critical technological advancements, has fueled concerns about a potential "tech iron curtain" and amplified discussions about national self-reliance in AI. In this charged atmosphere, Gopalakrishnan’s backing of Piramal’s "right perspective" serves as a timely reminder of India’s distinct and vital role in the global technological ecosystem.

The Genesis of the Debate: India’s AI Footprint Under Scrutiny

The discussion surrounding India’s position in the global AI hierarchy is not new, but it has certainly intensified with the meteoric rise of generative AI. Since the public release of ChatGPT in late 2022, the world has witnessed an unprecedented acceleration in AI capabilities, prompting nations and corporations alike to reassess their strategic priorities. The sheer speed and scale of innovation from entities like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Microsoft have created a benchmark that has, perhaps unfairly, been applied universally.

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said

Early 2020s: Even before the generative AI explosion, India had been actively developing its national AI strategy. Initiatives like "AI for All" aimed at leveraging AI for inclusive growth, focusing on areas like healthcare, agriculture, and education. However, the focus was largely on application and adoption rather than foundational model development.

Late 2022 – Early 2023: The launch of ChatGPT ignited public imagination and sparked a global "AI arms race." This period saw significant investment from venture capitalists and tech giants into frontier AI research, with billions poured into developing ever more sophisticated LLMs and multimodal AI systems. It was during this time that the question "Why isn’t India building its own ChatGPT?" began to surface more frequently in public discourse, often accompanied by criticism directed at the large Indian IT service companies. Critics argued that with India’s vast talent pool and technological prowess, the absence of a homegrown foundational model indicated a lack of ambition or strategic vision.

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said

Mid-2020s: As the geopolitical landscape shifted, so too did the regulatory environment around advanced AI. Concerns over national security, data sovereignty, and the potential for misuse of powerful AI models led several governments, most notably the United States, to consider and implement stricter export controls. These controls aim to limit the transfer of cutting-edge AI technology to potential adversaries, inadvertently creating a complex web of restrictions for international collaboration and access.

It was against this backdrop of escalating global competition and tightening regulatory frameworks that Piramal, an X user, penned his now-viral post. His argument methodically dismantled the premise of criticism, highlighting the fundamental differences between Indian IT’s operational mandate and the expectations of frontier AI development. Kris Gopalakrishnan, recognizing the critical relevance and accuracy of this perspective, swiftly endorsed it, stating simply, "Thanks for the right perspective." This public backing from an industry veteran provided an authoritative voice to a previously fragmented argument, shifting the conversation towards a more informed and strategic understanding of India’s unique AI trajectory.

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said

Supporting Data: Deconstructing Indian IT’s Strategic Value

Piramal’s comprehensive argument, championed by Gopalakrishnan, rests on several pillars that differentiate the Indian IT sector’s role and value proposition from that of Silicon Valley’s AI startups. These pillars underscore not a deficit in capability, but a deliberate and economically rational strategic choice.

The Distinct Business Models: Public Giants vs. Venture-Backed Innovators

At the core of the argument is the fundamental difference in business models. Indian IT companies like TCS, Infosys, Wipro, and HCL Technologies are behemoths in the global services industry. They are publicly listed entities, beholden to millions of shareholders who expect consistent profits, stable dividends, and predictable growth. Their corporate structures are optimized for long-term, low-risk, high-volume service delivery, generating significant cash flows through large-scale projects in software development, maintenance, BPO, infrastructure management, and cloud services for global clients.

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said

In stark contrast, companies like OpenAI and Anthropic operate on a venture capital model. They are typically private entities, funded by billions of dollars from a handful of major tech investors (e.g., Microsoft’s multi-billion-dollar investment in OpenAI, Google’s investment in Anthropic). This funding model allows them to pursue "moonshot" projects with incredibly high research and development costs, often without immediate pressure for profitability. Developing a frontier AI model like ChatGPT requires astronomical investments – not just in top-tier AI researchers and engineers, but critically, in massive computing infrastructure. Training a state-of-the-art LLM can cost hundreds of millions of dollars, consuming vast amounts of energy and requiring tens of thousands of specialized AI chips like Nvidia H100s, which themselves cost tens of thousands of dollars per unit and are in scarce global supply.

Piramal’s analogy powerfully illustrates this divergence: "If an Indian IT CEO announced tomorrow that they were cutting shareholder dividends by 80 per cent to buy 50,000 Nvidia H100 chips to build a speculative Indic LLM, the stock would crash 30 per cent by noon. Their corporate structure is legally optimized for steady margins, not venture-capital roulette." This isn’t a hypothetical; it reflects the deep-seated expectations of public market investors who prioritize financial stability over high-risk, speculative bets, regardless of their potential long-term payoff. For a publicly traded company, such a move would be seen as a dereliction of fiduciary duty, risking immediate and severe market repercussions.

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said

The Economic Bedrock: Exports, Forex, and Macroeconomic Stability

Beyond their corporate structures, Indian IT firms play a pivotal role in the nation’s macroeconomic stability. Piramal highlighted that the sector generates "over $200 billion annually in foreign currency." This massive influx of US dollars is far more than just revenue; it is a critical anchor for the Indian economy.

This steady stream of foreign exchange serves several vital functions:

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said
  • Rupee Stabilization: The continuous inflow of dollars helps to stabilize the Indian Rupee against major global currencies. In a volatile global economy, a stable currency is crucial for import-dependent nations, preventing imported inflation and providing predictability for businesses.
  • Foreign Exchange Reserves: These earnings significantly bolster India’s foreign exchange reserves, which act as a buffer against external shocks. As of early 2026, India’s forex reserves consistently rank among the largest globally, providing the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) with considerable leverage to manage economic challenges, navigate global inflation, and ensure financial security.
  • Geopolitical Leverage: Piramal explicitly connected these reserves to India’s ability to "purchase Russian oil/navigate global inflation." During periods of geopolitical tension or supply chain disruptions, strong forex reserves allow India to make strategic economic decisions, such as securing essential commodities like oil, without being unduly constrained by currency depreciation or international pressure. The IT sector’s contribution directly translates into enhanced national economic sovereignty and resilience.

In essence, the Indian IT sector isn’t just about software; it’s a foundational pillar of India’s economic security, providing a crucial hedge against global uncertainties and enabling strategic autonomy.

A Ladder to Prosperity: Employment and Social Mobility

Perhaps one of the most profound contributions of the Indian IT sector is its role in employment generation and social mobility. Piramal underscored that the industry "directly employs more than five million people." These are high-quality, often high-paying jobs in software development, quality assurance, cybersecurity, cloud engineering, data analytics, and business process management, catering to a global clientele.

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said

Beyond direct employment, the sector indirectly supports millions of additional jobs across a vast ecosystem:

  • Real Estate: The burgeoning IT hubs in cities like Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Pune, and Chennai have fueled massive growth in commercial and residential real estate.
  • Hospitality & Retail: The influx of IT professionals has spurred demand for hotels, restaurants, shopping malls, and entertainment venues.
  • Transportation & Logistics: The need to commute, travel for business, and support urban populations has driven growth in public and private transportation networks.
  • Education: The continuous demand for skilled talent has led to the proliferation of engineering colleges, vocational training centers, and upskilling platforms.

Piramal eloquently described the IT sector as "the single largest escalator that took the Indian middle class from tier-2 & tier-3 towns & gave them global purchasing power." This is a testament to its transformative power, lifting entire families out of poverty, providing access to education and healthcare, and fostering a new generation of globally aware, aspirational professionals.

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said

Furthermore, in the context of AI, there’s often a fear of job displacement. However, Indian IT firms are strategically addressing this by focusing on reskilling and upskilling their vast workforce. Rather than replacing workers with AI, these companies are investing heavily in training employees to adapt to AI-driven roles, such as AI/ML engineers, data scientists, prompt engineers, AI governance specialists, and AI integration architects. This proactive approach ensures that the workforce remains relevant and continues to be a competitive advantage in the evolving technological landscape.

The True AI Opportunity: Implementation and Integration

Piramal’s final, and perhaps most prescient, argument is that the most consistent and profitable AI opportunity may not lie in creating foundational models, but in helping businesses effectively use them. This is where Indian IT firms, with their decades of experience in large-scale enterprise integration, truly shine.

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said

His "construction crews" analogy is apt: "When the hype settles, the companies that make the most consistent money are not the ones selling the raw steel (the LLM makers); it’s the construction crews building the actual skyscrapers (the IT service integrators)."

Indian IT companies possess unparalleled expertise in:

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said
  • Large-scale Integration: Connecting cutting-edge AI models with complex, often legacy, enterprise systems (ERPs, CRMs, supply chain management). This is a monumental task that requires deep domain knowledge and technical acumen.
  • Customized AI Solutions: Fine-tuning general-purpose LLMs with proprietary data to create industry-specific or company-specific AI applications that solve real-world business problems.
  • Enterprise-scale Deployment: Managing the secure, scalable, and compliant deployment of AI solutions across vast organizational structures, often spanning multiple geographies.
  • Data Strategy and Governance: Helping clients establish robust data pipelines, ensure data quality, and implement ethical AI governance frameworks – critical for responsible AI adoption.
  • Cost-Efficiency and Global Delivery: Leveraging their established global delivery models and cost advantages to provide AI implementation services at scale.

While governments, research institutions, and specialized startups may spearhead the development of frontier AI models, it is the Indian IT sector that will likely play the crucial role of democratizing AI, making it accessible, functional, and valuable for businesses worldwide. They are the essential bridge between raw AI innovation and tangible business outcomes.

Official Responses: A Broader Indian AI Vision

The perspective articulated by Piramal and endorsed by Gopalakrishnan is not an isolated one. It resonates with a broader strategic vision for AI in India, echoed by other industry leaders and government initiatives.

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said

NASSCOM, India’s premier IT industry body, has consistently emphasized the importance of AI adoption and application across sectors, rather than solely focusing on foundational research. Their reports often highlight India’s strength in AI services, data analytics, and digital transformation, positioning the country as a global hub for AI implementation. Leaders from other major IT firms have also articulated similar views, emphasizing their firms’ roles in helping clients leverage AI for efficiency, innovation, and competitive advantage.

The Indian government’s "India AI" initiative, for instance, focuses on fostering an ecosystem for AI development and application. While it includes provisions for building compute infrastructure and supporting AI research, a significant thrust is on "AI for All" – using AI to solve India’s unique social and economic challenges. This often translates into developing AI applications for healthcare diagnostics, agricultural yield prediction, smart city management, and educational personalization, all areas where the integration capabilities of Indian IT firms are invaluable.

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said

Moreover, while the large IT service companies are focused on their core business models, India is actively engaged in foundational AI research through other avenues. Premier academic institutions like the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) and the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), along with various government research laboratories and a burgeoning ecosystem of specialized AI startups, are indeed working on cutting-edge AI models, including Indic language LLMs. This clarifies that "India" is participating in foundational AI research, but through different organizational structures and with different mandates than the established IT service giants. This diversified approach ensures that India contributes to both the creation and widespread application of AI technology.

Implications: Redefining Success in the AI Era

Kris Gopalakrishnan’s endorsement of Piramal’s argument is more than just a defense; it’s a strategic redefinition of success for Indian IT in the age of AI. It challenges the simplistic notion that leadership in AI is solely measured by the creation of a foundational model, suggesting a more nuanced and ultimately more impactful pathway for India.

Why has India not built AI chatbot like ChatGPT? This is what Infosys co-founder has said

The implications of this perspective are profound:

  • Strategic Advantage: By leaning into their strengths as "construction crews" rather than "raw steel" providers, Indian IT firms can cement their strategic advantage in the global AI ecosystem. Their expertise in integration, customization, and large-scale deployment positions them as indispensable partners for businesses worldwide seeking to harness the power of AI effectively and responsibly.
  • Sustainable Growth Model: This approach aligns with their established, publicly traded business models, promising sustainable growth and consistent returns for shareholders, while simultaneously driving innovation for their clients. It avoids the high-risk, capital-intensive "venture-capital roulette" that is often unsuitable for mature, publicly listed companies.
  • Enhanced National Resilience: The continued success of the Indian IT sector in this redefined AI landscape will only strengthen its role as an economic bedrock for India, ensuring continued foreign exchange earnings, rupee stability, and robust employment generation.
  • Talent Development: By focusing on AI implementation, Indian IT companies will continue to drive demand for a vast array of AI-related skills, fostering a continuously evolving talent pool that is adept at applying AI in practical, business-centric scenarios. This will ensure India remains a global talent powerhouse for digital technologies.
  • A Balanced Global AI Landscape: This perspective promotes a more balanced understanding of the global AI landscape, recognizing that different nations and entities will play distinct, yet equally critical, roles. While some may focus on discovery, others will excel at deployment, creating a symbiotic ecosystem where innovation meets practical application.

The journey ahead will not be without challenges. Indian IT firms must continuously invest in staying abreast of rapidly evolving AI technologies, navigating the complexities of AI ethics and regulation, and fending off increasing global competition in the services sector. However, by embracing their unique strengths and focusing on the immense opportunity in AI implementation, the Indian IT sector is poised not merely to survive the AI revolution but to thrive as its essential enabler. This "right perspective" championed by Kris Gopalakrishnan ensures that India’s contribution to the global AI narrative is understood in its full, multifaceted, and strategically vital context.

By Basiran